Monday 27 February 2012

Thought for the day - Marriage vs Civil Partnerships



For those who struggled with the blog relating to the Coalition for Marriage a couple of days back - here's someone who is in the pro camp (hoping I can use that word without offence :-) ) when it comes to keeping marriage and civil partnerships distinct and separate.

All grist to the mill I guess - enjoy!

ps. Not an invitation to punch-up but it is interesting to see how, even within themselves, the groups divide isn't it?

Pax

For those who would like to see another (differing) view of this debate (disccusion, argument?) take a look at the 'Coalition for Equal Marriage' site here .

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Those who wish to have a civil partnership are now free to find someone who will say the religious words when they do it so what's all the fuss about the word 'marriage' for goodness sakes?

Seems logical if marriage is regarded as the union of two people (male and female) who have the (natural, not scientific) potential to procreate and the civil partnership maintained for those who are same sex and thus precluded from (natural) procreative processes.

Interest clip Vic - thank you.

KeyReed said...

Good old Biggins!