Showing posts with label bigots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bigots. Show all posts

Saturday, 4 February 2017

Journal: I want it my way

Life is frustrating at times, especially when you encounter people who want to work with you on their terms and want to see change, as long as it is change in you for their benefit!

"I'm different to you," they cry, "so to make it work you need to change your language, your thinking, the way you do things so that we can work together and our differences affirmed." But you know what? I don't think so!

I like the fact that I work with different people from different backgrounds, places, denominations, sexualities and even different sexes (both of them!) BUT as much as I am willing (no more than just willing - I desire and crave) to work with others, I am fed up to the eyebrows with the victim and the self-proclaimed marginalised 'others' in whose company I might find myself.

"I'm different and so to have a valid and effective relationship you need to act and affirm me in whatever way I say is right," they say. "I live like this and so unless you positively affirm and applaud whatever is it that I like, do, don 't like or do, then you are acting against me!"

You know what, this is tosh and the silly games of 'Someone says' we play these days are less about equality and dialogue and more about power, domination and oppression. I don't drink coffee but don't care in the person across the does or not - that's their choice - and that's mine!

I'm an Anglican - that's actually a choice by the way, there are deep theological reasons for being so - you might be something else but that's great for our unity in the face of our differences speaks of something special regarding God (Father, Son and Holy Spirit). But to tell me that because the word 'bishop' or 'diocese' has been used that you are marginalised and somehow excluded is cobblers!

"You need to change the way you speak or else we feel left out," is actually, should we employ a sensibly configured Babel fish translated as, "I want to be in control; I will only be happy if you do it my way!" Change parish and diocese for area, district or region or whatever you fancy and what have we done? You tell me!

Today I was told that we need to embrace being 'cisgender' and 'transgender' and avoid using gender specifics (including 'gender specific' dress codes at meals) in case we offend someone - but should anyone mention the fact that the nit-picking examination of everything around us to avoid upsetting one person is destined to offend me and, for almost certainly different reasons, those around me!

Being  'cis' means my gender matches the sex I was born with - if I've changed it then I am 'trans'. Actually I'm just 'me' and that's all the label, other than 'saved', that I need.

I am continually being forced to change so that others who are different from me can feel comfortable - not a bad idea, after all didn't Paul say that he was Greek to the Greek, Jews to the Jew, etc? Actually the problem comes by the word 'forced' - not in an internal 'compelled internally' sort of way, but in in a thought police, usurping and oppressive sort of way - and it is indeed a problem.

Time and time again I find myself with people who are uncomfortable with things around them but they choose to comply on the outside and decry in the safety that distance brings causing their 'yes' to be 'yes' when in the company of some and to become 'no' once they can be themselves. And this is wrong - very wrong.

The thought police are out there and working hard are making us affirm everyone and everything but ourselves and yet to offer any resistance or suggest that rather than demands, dialogue is the way forward, is to be greeted with attempts at rehabilitation and correction. (Thankfully I am not, nor to date have ever been in that boat, but give it time and I'm sure the 'resistance is futile' thought police will find my hiding place).

So how do I affirm others whilst keeping my integrity?

Some around me seem to have missed the naked Emperor in the room and are determined instead to eat the elephant a bite at a time!

How do I avoid disempowering people without unequally empowering them?

The same person who takes offence at the use of one word will, because it is their right as someone from a hitherto disenfranchised group, oppress others from their position to ';taking back' whatever it is.

How do I become all things to all people without unequally affirming some at the expense of others.

I asked a colleague (from a different denomination/grouping) these questions  and asked their opinion. Their response (as a different sex to me) was a bit of a welcome shock: "They just need to grow a pair!' they said. Odd;y, the same response from a male colleague too.

Perhaps there is wisdom in the counsel of many :-)

O Lord - help us in our weakness to not turn it into a strength that denies You and damages others.


This place of reflection is here for me to dialogue and to welcome dialogue and insight. It first appeared as an extension of this blog for some of those looking at creating their own mourn as part of the their journey to discerning vocation. The Morning prayer is there also for that same purpose: discipline of prayer.




Tuesday, 11 September 2012

Green? You need to be with some Political Parties!!

Seems that being a member of the Green party and having a personal integrity are not the equal bedfellows some have claimed in the past as I listen to an interview with a former Green party Councillor from Brighton, Christina Summers. Ms Summers has been expelled from the party because she dared to vote against a motion supporting the Government's plans to introduce same-sex marriage.

Summers apparently had the audacity to think that touching marriage meant touching family and this would hit at the very heart of God and this was something she had 'an enormous problem' with.

Seems to me that anyone who thinks the Green Party is a party that supports equality and diversity needs to think again, for you'd have to be green to believe that this party is in any way moderate, balanced or tolerant (well they are tolerant of what they believe I guess). Still the prize has to go to the Greens own spokesman (shouldn't that be spokesperson?) with the witterance:

“Councillor Summers has a long standing position of conscience about religious marriage based on her faith. Greens believe she is entitled to hold her view but this does not reflect the position, spirit and track record of the Green Party in extending human and civil rights for all social groups irrespective of sexual orientation or on other grounds."

So they've thrown her out because Greens obviously do not believe that she is entitled to hold her views!

Perhaps Ms Summers would do better if she decided to join another party. Perhaps she could join the LibDems, after all they stand for equality and diversity and the right of the individual to have different viewpoints. Surely they'd support her right to have her views?

What's that Sooty, what's the BBC saying?

"Nick Clegg has withdrawn comments about opponents of gay marriage in which he called them "bigots". The deputy PM was expected to launch an attack on those against the policy - which include some Tory MPs - in a speech at a reception later. But the wording of extracts released to the media has been changed. Sources close to Mr Clegg said the "bigot" claim was "a mistake" in an early draft of the speech which should not have been released to the press."

Of course it shouldn't, Clegg and his bunch of Muppets are like so many others who value diversity and personal integrity - it's OK as long as it's the same brand of opinion as theirs.

Seems the fascist thought-police are running the show and those who seek to maintain their personal integrity by standing for what they believe are to be hounded out, pilloried and sorely treated. Of course they are - it's the way of the liberal. Bigots? They certainly are!

As for Clegg - here's the front cover of that most essential of reading matter, 'Private Eye', which sums it up nicely: