Wednesday, 6 April 2011

A bit of a hop

Having taken the 'first step' we find ourselves having to 'hop' in that, as was pointed out extremely well (and with some good examples), the society in which we find ourselves leans towards some people being, "More equal than others!"

I was given examples of some groups being afforded more concessions than others through fear of appearing, or worse still being labelled, 'racist' or 'anti-Islamic, had they said 'No' to something. The other side of this coin is that to say 'No' to members of our 'own' society (or to member of the national faith i.e. Christian) would just be being honest and 'normal'.

And so it transpires that when concessions are made to (as a 'for instance') Islamic groups, those who make the concessions are being racist (a situation which in today's society needs to be addressed), those who make the decisions are acting against the natural sense of justice and fair play. The antonym of Xenophobia is, of course, tolerance and this is what freedom of speech and choosing how we live is all about.

Being a member of a faith, gender, orientation or any of people group often leads the members of it to assume that they have some 'god-given' right to be treated differently and this is no the case. The fact that any of us might have a faith, or no faith, does not confer upon us the right to become a 'special case'. The problem is two-fold in that where a religious group is also considered to be 'ethnic' (whether this be because of country of origin or because of the observance practices) we find the ghetto mentality (and reality) becoming established and because of the concentrations of one people groups (ethnic, religious or whatever) we find temples, mosques and the like peppering the area and establishing 'no go zones'.

As a Cockney I have experienced this on a number of occasions and in a number of places, here's just a few:

The Jewish community in Stamford Hill (and the more well off cousins in Hendon and Ilford)

The Bangladeshi community around the Bethnal Green area

Brick Lane, Slough, Southall and the like.

I have been in places where caste wars were to be found, where a Sikh speaker was shot dead over the Punjab issue, where various sects within Islam were often to be found fighting and more besides.

Why, because people didn't want 'them' living next door and so supported the establishment of the very communities they now fear as being ghettos.

People are free to take a pop at what I believe. They are free to put banners denying what I consider to be true and labelling it as cobblers! This is what freedom of speech is about. When Jesus was portrayed in a way that upset many Christians, it was 'art'. When the same thing happened with the religion being Sikh, the theatre pulled the performance immediately because of the (much smaller) demonstration and complaints form 'community' leaders.

I happen across books that proclaim Christ and Christianity to be a load of BS every day. Do the writers have to go into hiding? Do the Christians pronounce death threats? No, of course not. But when other religions do so, we tut and make excuses for them. Why, because we're being racist! "They' don't know any better! "They're' just a bunch of ignorant savages with an ignorant and primitive, uncultured faith.

I have a right to be Christian. Another has a right to be Islamic. Still another has a right to be a humanist, or secularist or whatever they so wish. I have a right to practice my faith, other have a right to practice their lack of it. How we work this out, how we debate, dialogue and challenge the attitudes and belief (or non-belief) of others is part of the journey and the hallmark of a balanced and tolerant society.

The fear shown by some in challenging something because it's 'Islamic' or 'ethnic' or 'Gay' or 'Christian' (well actually there's no fear in challenging Christians, they appear to be an easy target and fair game for all) is actually destroying our nation's balance, culture, tolerance and exhibiting injustice and prejudice.

Prejudice is wrong, whether it is positive or negative. It is wrong!

making decisions through fear of reprisal is wrong, this is capitulation and we have seen too much of it in our nation. Equal values, level playing fields, respect for all and accountability and tolerant, honest challenging, and decision making is the only way this nation will be saved from slipping into the mire.

Oddly, this is the message of the God of the Christians and the Jews.

Pax

2 comments:

UKViewer said...

Vic,

I have been reflecting on the word 'Tolerant' recently, is seems to me that it is mis-used in some circumstances.

We say that we 'tolerate' someone, or something, some behaviour, belief or actions, when what we really means is 'Yes its legal',but 'I don't like it, you can do what you like - just don't come into my space with it'.

Real tolerance comes across as acceptance of differences in love and respect for the integrity of difference.

In the main I think of this of trying to see a reflection of Christ in all mankind, who he created, whether or not they accept Christ. I cannot accept that those who are not Christians are not inherently good, that they can live lives, which accord very much with the teachings and example of Christ for us. They might use different names or labels, but I cannot deny their right to live in accordance with their beliefs or culture.

Acceptance of difference in love, coming back to the second, greatest commandment still rules for me.

Anonymous said...

I haven't though of positive discrimination as being racist or being prejudiced, for or against, but can see that you are making a valid observation.

I have supported positive action because I thought it was Christian openhandedness but now fear I might have been wrong.

Thank you.