What is sure is that the bloke has not started a sixty year war and that he neither promotes any true Christian viewpoint or any element of Biblical teaching in what he believes. He voices anger against his own nation's cultural, political and societal standards which were (in his view) fuelling the spectre of a growing Islamic population (and power) and many other issues besides.
I haven't seen any photographs of the bloke wearing a mitre or a dog-collar, neither has I seen images of him carrying a Bible but there one of him dressed as a Mason! Perhaps the headlines should be mentioning this rather than the Christian bit!
Mind you, it might be worthwhile pointing out that Jones and Sapp appear to have helped sow the seeds that flowered in the death of so many innocents with their brand of Islamaphobic self-promoting tosh!
So, when someone mentions this tragic happening and uses the word 'Christian' would you kindly point out that this doesn't appear to match up with the accounts of his writings - it's just the result of lazy and inadequate journalists (and perhaps also the result of some spin on their part too!) If they want a label, tell them 'Brevik is a nationalist extremist' (nuff said?)
Pax
